Skip to main content

REVIEW FROM THE ARTICLE : EU PLANS TO RAISE TAX BILL OF ONLINE GIANTS GATHER MOMENTUM



EU PLANS TO RAISE TAX BILL OF ONLINE GIANTS GATHER MOMENTUM

Nearly one third of European Union states backed a plan to tax digital multinationals on their turnover, France said on Friday, as the EU weighs a range of other measures to increase the tax bill of companies like Google and Amazon.
European Economic and Financial Affairs Commissioner Pierre Moscovici gestures during his meeting with Greek Prime Minister Alexis Tsipras (not pictured) at Maximos Mansion in Athens, Greece, July 25, 2017. REUTERS/Alkis Konstantinidis/Files
TALLINN: Nearly one third of European Union states backed a plan to tax digital multinationals on their turnover, France said on Friday, as the EU weighs a range of other measures to increase the tax bill of companies like Google and Amazon.
The moves are part of a growing campaign in the EU to claim tax revenues that online giants are accused of skirting by routing most of their profits to low tax rate states, like Ireland and Luxembourg.
"The digital economy should be taxed as the rest of the economy," the EU commissioner for taxation, Pierre Moscovici, told reporters upon his arrival on Friday to a meeting of euro zone and EU finance ministers in Tallinn, the Estonian capital.
A report published on Thursday by influential EU lawmaker Paul Tang estimated that Google, which has its EU tax residence in Ireland, paid taxes not higher than 0.8 percent of its EU revenues between 2013 and 2015.
Facebook, also based in Ireland, had a ratio as little as 0.1 percent in the same period, while Luxembourg-based Amazon paid almost nothing as it reported nearly no profits.
Facebook and Google were not immediately available to comment on the proposals when contacted by Reuters.
COMPETING PLANS
Most of the 28 EU states agree in principle with more effective taxation of digital companies, but differences remain on how to move forward.
A plan proposed by France to tax large digital corporations on their turnover, rather than on their profits, is gaining supporters, although still needs technical work.
France's Finance Minister Bruno Le Maire told a news conference on Friday that a total of nine countries "formally joined the initiative". In addition to France, they are Germany, Italy, Spain, Austria, Bulgaria, Greece, Slovenia and Latvia.
A tax on turnover would raise revenues also from companies, like Amazon, that do not report profits, and would be likely applied quickly, a European official said.
However, it would need to be made compliant with EU internal market rules. States could also apply it unilaterally, but that would expose them to a higher chance of legal challenges, the official said.
Opposition from smaller states would need to be overcome, as countries like Ireland and Luxembourg may lose tax revenues from the new framework.
Tax reforms in the EU need unanimity among EU states, a factor that has blocked many overhauls in the past.
Estonia, who holds the EU rotating presidency, is pushing for a more structural approach. It wants the EU to agree that a company could be taxed when it is "virtually" present in a country, through a digital platform for instance.
At the moment, businesses are taxed only in countries where they have a concrete presence, such as a plant.
This change could be introduced in a review of EU rules on the tax base that are under discussion in the Parliament and among EU states. Tang plans to submit an amendment going in that direction.
The European Commission, the EU's executive, said it will present in the coming days a document listing several options for moving forward.
A Commission official said the document could propose five or six possible measures, including the French and the Estonian plans. He warned against risks of diverging taxation in EU states and insisted a compromise on a common set of rules should be the objective.
The document will be ready for a summit of EU leaders dedicated to digital issues that will be held in Tallinn on Sept. 29, Moscovici said.
(Reporting by Francesco Guarascio @fraguarascio, editing by Robin Emmott)
Source: Reuters, http://www.channelnewsasia.com/news/technology/eu-plans-to-raise-tax-bill-of-online-giants-gather-momentum-9222100

 

REVIEW BASED ON THE ARTICLE ABOVE : (THIS REVIEW COMPLETELY BELONGS TO ME)

The article I’ve read is mainly talks about EU plans to raise tax bill of online giants like Google and Amazon. According to what France’s said on Friday, nearly one third of European Union states backed a plan to tax digital multinationals on their turnover, as the EU weighs a range of other measures to increase the tax bill of companies like Google and Amazon. The plans are the part of growing campaign in the EU to claim tax revenues that online giants are accused of skirting by routing most of their profits to low tax rate states, like Ireland and Luxembourg. Based on a report published on Thursday by influential EU lawmaker Paul Tang estimated that Google, which has its EU tax residence in Ireland, paid taxes not higher than 0.8 percent of its EU revenues between 2013 and 2015. Facebook, also based in Ireland, had a ratio as little as 0.1 percent in the same period, while Luxembourg-based Amazon paid almost nothing as it reported nearly no profits. A plan proposed by France to tax large digital corporations on their turnover, rather than on their profits, is gaining supporters, although still needs technical work. However, it would need to be made compliant with EU internal market rules and also tax reforms in the EU need unanimity among EU states.

For me, the article is quite amazing. The sentence is easy to understand although there are some difficult words. The article is much interesting because I’ve never read it before, and it gives me lots of knowledge that not only Indonesia that has a problem in taxes which is influence the national’s revenue. But also the other countries. The article makes me curious about how much the disadvantages caused by Google and Facebook, because it not mentioned on the article. Then I searching for the answer in pemeriksaanpajak.com, telling that EU lost 85 Trillion rupiahs on Google and Facebook Taxes. As both companies are known to manage most of their EU revenues to countries with low tax provisions. This step also automatically allows them to pay taxes in the EU region much lower than the taxes they have to pay in countries in other regions. 85 trillion rupiahs, a very large nominal which of course we can not imagine how much if it cashed. And I'm sure both Google and Facebook's own revenue, folding over 85 Trillion. Hence, I agree with EU’s plan to impose tax digital multinationals on their turnover and increasing the tax bill of companies.
In conclusion, I strongly support the EU’s plan because the digital economy should be taxed as the rest of the economy and impose the taxes on the company’s turnover. However, it would need to be made compliant with EU internal market rules. Because there is an opposition from smaller states like Ireland and Luxembourg, they may lose tax revenues from the new framework. So that, the tax reforms in the EU need unanimity among EU states. And I think, it should be further regulated by law and given strict sanctions, so that they are willing to pay taxes.

Comments

Popular posts from this blog

SOAL PPH TENTANG OBJEK PAJAK (BENAR SALAH DAN PILIHAN GANDA)

SOAL BENAR SALAH 1.        Penghasilan adalah setiap tambahan kemampuan ekonomis yang diterima/ diperoleh WP yang berasal dari dalam negeri yang dapat dipakai untuk menambah kekayaan Wajib Pajak yang bersangkutan dengan nama dalam bentuk apapun. SALAH Penghasilan adalah setiap tambahan kemampuan ekonomis yang diterima/ diperoleh WP yang berasal dari dalam negeri yang dapat dipakai untuk menambah kekayaan Wajib Pajak yang bersangkutan dengan nama dalam bentuk apapun. Penghasilan tidak hanya yang berasal dari dalam negeri saja, tapi juga dari luar negeri 2.        Harta hibah yang diterima keluarga sedarah dalam garis keturunan lurus satu derajat dikenai PPh Final. SALAH Harta hibah yang diterima keluarga sedarah dalam garis keturunan lurus satu derajat tidak termasuk objek pajak penghasilan, jadi tidak dikenakan pajak. 3.       Iuran pensiun dibayar pemberi kerja termasuk bukan objek pajak. BENAR 4.       Bagi badan yang memiliki kepemilikan saham paling rendah

CONTOH ANALISIS SWOT PADA DIRI SENDIRI

ANALISIS SWOT PADA DIRI SENDIRI   Analisis SWOT merupakan salah satu analisis tentang factor internal dan eksternal pada saat ini secara deskriftif agar dapat menghadapi semua tantangan dan ancaman di masa yang akan datang serta dapat mempersiapkan diri untuk menyesuaikan perubahan lingkungan yang dapat mempengaruhi pencapaian harapan dan keinginan. SWOT adalah singkatan dari Strengths (kekuatan), Weakness (Kelemahan), Opportunities dan Treat. 1.       S trengths Adalah situasi atau kondisi yang merupakan kekuatan yang dimiliki oleh seseorang, organisasi, atau sebuah program saat ini yang bisa berpengaruh positif di masa yang akan datang. Contoh strengths : 1)       Dalam pelajaran dapan menyerap apa yang dijelaskan oleh guru atau dosen. Bila masih terdapat kesulitan, biasanya saya akan mempelajarinya kembali setelah pelajaran selesai dan berlatih mengerjakan soal agar saya benar-benar menguasainya. 2)       Mampu fokus dalam sesuatu hal yang ingin dicapai

CIVIL LAW : PENGERTIAN, KARAKTERISTIK, SUMBER HUKUM, NEGARA YANG MENERAPKAN

CIVIL LAW (HUKUM SIPIL) a.         Pengertian civil law Hukum sipil adalah sistem hukum yang diilhami dari hukum Romawi dengan ciri ditulis dalam suatu kumpulan, di kodifikasi , dan tidak dibuat oleh hakim. [1] Secara konseptual, sistem ini merupakan sekumpulan gagasan dan sistem hukum yang berasal dari Codex Yustinianus , namun juga banyak dipengaruhi oleh hukum Jermanik Awal , gereja , feudal, praktik lokal, [2] serta kecenderungan doktrinal seperti hukum kodrat , kodifikasi , dan positivisme hukum . Hukum sipil bersifat abstrak. Asas-asas umum dirumuskan, dan perbedaan antara hukum substantif dengan prosedural ditekankan. [3] Dalam sistem ini legislasi dipandang sebagai sumber hukum utama, dan sistem pengadilannya biasanya tidak terikat dengan pendahulu ( stare decisis ) dan terdiri dari petugas-petugas yudisial terlatih dengan kekuasaan penafsiran hukum yang terbatas. Prinsip hukum sipil adalah menyediakan kumpulan hukum yang tertulis dan dapat diakses kepada